Yes No Share to Facebook
Claiming Disgorgement Remedy
Involves Taking Benefits or Profits Away From a Wrongdoer
Last Updated: June 11 2026
Question: Can I sue in Ontario to recover a wrongdoer’s profits even if I didn’t suffer a financial loss?
Answer: In Ontario, a Lawyer can assess whether you may claim disgorgement (a restitution remedy that strips ill-gotten gains) when the wrongdoer profited from misconduct even if your loss is minimal or hard to prove, such as in limited “profiting from wrong” unjust enrichment situations; a key discussion appears in Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 6534. Contact Kush Law to review your facts, identify the strongest remedy for your claim across Ontario, and call (905) 460-5073 to get started.
What Can a Victim of Wrongdoing Claim In a Lawsuit If the Victim Was Without the Suffering of a Loss But the Wrongdoer Received a Benefit or Profit From the Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
There are some circumstances in which a wrongdoer receives a benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and yet the victim is without a corresponding harm or loss. Generally, under legal principles akin to no harm, no foul concepts, a legitimate lawsuit permits compensation for the loss or harm suffered by the victim; however, in some circumstances it is proper to claim disgorgement of benefits or profits received by the wrongdoer.
The Law
Disgorgement remedy, as a stripping of ill gotten gains from a wrongdoer, was well explained within the Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, case wherein it was stated:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
Imagine a situation where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud upon another person. In some circumstances, the victim may experience little harm or was able to mitigate all or most of the harm that resulted from the fraud and thus little loss, if any occurs; however, the wrongdoer may have significantly benefited or profited from the fraud. The law, applied by the courts, seeking to discourage and deter wrongful conduct, may order that the benefits or profits be disgorged from the wrongdoer and provided to the victim. In this way the remedy of disgorgement ensures that the wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and is, presumably, discouraged and deterred from engaging in wrongful conduct.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy rather than a compensatory remedy, meaning that the law applies disgorgement as a matter of fairness rather than as a matter of making a victim whole for loss or harm suffered by the victim.
